Immigrant Mothers' Perspectives on Pediatric Primary Care: Challenges and Solutions to Improve Medical Home Use.

Children in immigrant families (CIF) constitute 25% of all children in the United States. Known barriers to accessing and navigating the health care system for immigrants (i.e., poverty, fear, limited English proficiency, lack of insurance) lead to decreased medical home establishment among CIF, although the ways in which these obstacles affect medical home access are less studied. With a focus on Congolese, Afghan, Syrian/Iraqi, and Central American immigrants, key informant interviews and focus groups were conducted to identify mothers' perceptions of and experiences with pediatric primary health care. Five common themes emerged: mothers' critical role in children's health, uniqueness of the U.S. health care system, logistical challenges, influence of prior clinical experiences, and importance of culturally appropriate communication. Few, but distinct, differences among the groups revealed specific obstacles for individual populations. Improving rates of medical home use among CIF requires targeted, immigrant-informed approaches that involve population outreach as well as systems-level changes.

State-Specific Medicaid/CHIP Eligibility Criteria and Their Impact on Health Care Access for Foreign-born Children Living in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Foreign-born children are subject to discrepant state policies in determining eligibility for Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of these policies on health care access. METHODS: Data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) were used to assess associations between health care access outcomes and three categories of state health insurance eligibility: restrictive (only U.S. citizens plus immigrants who "qualified" after five-year waiting period), semi-restrictive (same as restrictive except no waiting period), and inclusive (all children). RESULTS: When compared with restrictive states, foreign-born children in inclusive states were significantly more likely to have current insurance, consistent coverage, recent preventive exams, and fewer problems paying medical bills. DISCUSSION: Extending health care eligibility to all children, regardless of immigration status, improves health care coverage and access for foreign-born children. Expansion of eligibility criteria in all states is necessary to reduce health disparities in the immigrant population.

Public Benefit Use and Social Needs in Hospitalized Children With Undocumented Parents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies supporta recent decline in public benefit enrollment among immigrant families. We aimed to describe health and resource use, barriers to use, and immigration-related fear in families with undocumented parents compared with families without undocumented parents. We also aimed to assess associations with discontinuation of public benefits and fear of deportation. METHODS: We assessed immigration concerns and enrollment in Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) with an 89-item anonymous, cross-sectional survey of English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of hospitalized children. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations with discontinuation of public benefits and fear of deportation. RESULTS: Of 527 families approached, 399 enrolled (105 with 1 or more undocumented parent, 275 with no undocumented parent, and 19 with undisclosed immigration status). Compared with families without undocumented parents, families with undocumented parents had higher levels of poverty and food insecurity. Controlling for perceived eligibility, public benefit use was similar across groups. Of families with undocumented parents, 29% reported public benefit discontinuation because of immigration concerns, and 71% reported fear of deportation. Having an undocumented parent was associated with public benefit disenrollment (odds ratio: 46.7; 95% confidence interval: 5.9-370.4) and fear of deportation (odds ratio: 24.3; 95% confidence interval: 9.6-61.9). CONCLUSIONS: Although families with undocumented parents had higher levels of poverty and food insecurity compared with families without undocumented parents, public benefit use was similar between groups. Immigration-related fear may be a barrier to public benefit use in this population.

Hyaluronidase-Assisted Resuscitation in Kenya for Severely Dehydrated Children.

BACKGROUND: Dehydration, mainly due to diarrheal illnesses, is a leading cause of childhood mortality worldwide. Intravenous (IV) therapy is the standard of care for patients who were unable to tolerate oral rehydration; however, placing IVs in fragile, dehydrated veins can be challenging. Studies in resource-rich settings comparing hyaluronidase-assisted subcutaneous rehydration with standard IV rehydration in children have demonstrated several benefits of subcutaneous rehydration, including time and success of line placement, ease of use, satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: A single-arm trial assessing the feasibility of hyaluronidase-assisted subcutaneous resuscitation for the treatment of moderately to severely dehydrated individuals in western Kenya was conducted. Children aged 2 months or older who presented with moderately to severely dehydration clinically warranting parenteral rehydration and had at least 2 failed IV attempts were eligible. Study staff received training on standard dehydration management and hyaluronidase infusion processes. Children received all other standards of care. They were monitored from presentation and through discharge, with a 1-week phone follow-up. Predischarge surveys were completed by caregivers, and semistructured interviews with providers were performed. RESULTS: A total of 51 children were enrolled (median age, 13.0 months; interquartile range of 18 months). Fifty-one patients (100%) had severe dehydration. The median length of subcutaneous infusion was 3.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 2.95). The median total subcutaneous infusion was 700.0 mL (IQR, 420 mL). Median time to resolution of moderate to severe dehydration symptoms was 3.0 hours (IQR, 2.95 hours). There were no significant complications. CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronidase-assisted subcutaneous resuscitation is a feasible alternative to IV hydration in moderately to severely dehydrated children with difficult to obtain IV access in resource-limited areas.

Improving peace and well-being among Syrian refugee youth through a higher education initiative in Jordan.

Forced migration affects overall health, especially when it happens at a young age. Focus group discussions and the Peace Evaluation Across Cultures and Environments (PEACE) survey were used to compare the effects of the programme on two groups: refugee university students who received full tuition support and a monthly living stipend (intervention group) and unsponsored Syrian students who were preparing for the end of high school examination (control group). The overall mean PEACE score among the intervention group was 152.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 147.4-156.5), while the control group mean score was 134.1 (95% CI: 129.1-139.1), p < 0.01. In addition to significantly higher mean total PEACE scores, the intervention group demonstrated better results for each of the seven constructs in the scale (t-test p < 0.05), with the largest differences seen in personal safety, group cohesion and agency. This effect was further elucidated in the focus group discussions, highlighting the psychosocial benefits of the scholarship programme due to improvements in their academic and financial status. This combined education and economic intervention for Syrian refugee youth has measurable positive effects on feelings of peace, security and well-being and can be used as a framework from which to design similar initiatives in other contexts of displacement.

Developing Equitable Primary Health Care in Conflict-Affected Settings: Expert Perspectives From the Frontlines.

Health systems are frequently among the casualties of conflict. Within these settings, increased knowledge is needed on how to rebuild and strengthen health infrastructure resilience, such as primary health care (PHC) systems, in context-specific ways that promote health equity. Therefore, this study aimed to explore perspectives of experts with experience working on frontlines of social crises to contribute to understandings of pathways toward equitable PHC in conflict-affected settings. Semistructured qualitative interviews with 18 expert participants were completed. Through engaging elements of grounded theory situational analysis, three themes emerged iteratively, including (a) Building Blocks, (b) Intermediating Factors, and (c) a Roadmap. These emergent themes contribute to conceptual frameworks explaining key contextually specific priorities, challenges, and facilitating factors for developing resilient health infrastructures under social crises. Findings inform policy and practical guidelines that address complexities of conflict conditions and underscore the importance of PHC development toward promoting health as a human right.